Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteria is commonly known as MRSA and is a major source of infections in hospitals. (CDC) -By Scott LaFee
Union-Tribune Staff Writer
August 28, 2009
For years, scientists and doctors have watched with frustration as their arsenal of antibiotics has been reduced by the growing and inevitable emergence of drug-resistant bacteria and other microbes.
What they have needed, what modern medicine requires, is a new way to attack and kill infectious, disease-causing pathogens such as tuberculosis and multidrug-resistant staphylococcus.
In a paper published today in the journal Chemistry & Biology, researchers at Burnham Institute for Medical Research in La Jolla, with colleagues at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and the University of Maryland, say they may have found the basis for a new class of antibacterial agents capable of overcoming current multidrug resistance.
“The importance of emerging antibiotic-resistant pathogens cannot be overstated,” said Dr. Victor Nizet, who studies human immunology and infectious disease at the University of California San Diego. “There's no drug currently in clinical medicine in which there isn't at least one resistant strain of pathological microbe.”
Andrei Osterman, an associate professor at Burnham and member of its Infectious and Inflammatory Disease Center, said the new findings were not a silver bullet. “What we've found is a golden target,” he said.
That target is a bacterial enzyme called NadD, or nicotinate mononucleotide adenylyltransferase. If the enzyme is absent or its activity is suppressed, the bacterium dies. Versions of NadD are found in almost all cells, including human.
Using computer modeling, the researchers matched more than a million chemical compounds against the enzyme, eventually identifying a handful that interacted with and inhibited NadD activity. Subsequent experiments using E. coli and anthrax bacteria confirmed the compounds' inhibitory potential. But the compounds do not affect the human version of the NadD enzyme because its molecular structure is different.
“We're a long way yet from having an actual, new class of antibiotics, something that microbial pathogens have not seen before,” Osterman said. “But this is a major step. It is proof of concept. We've proved that this enzyme is a good target and that by suppressing it, you can kill bacteria.”
Osterman said it will require several more years of testing and research before any new, NadD-based antibiotic might emerge. The newly identified compounds must be further refined and improved, tested for toxicity and effectiveness in animal models and, eventually, in humans.
The bulk of that research will likely occur in academic and institutional settings, not within the pharmaceutical industry, which broadly views antibiotic research as less lucrative than other endeavors. Osterman's research was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Development of a new and effective broad-spectrum antibiotic can't come soon enough. Antibiotic resistance has become a major medical issue, with some pathogens having evolved through random mutations and the misuse of antibiotics to become almost invulnerable to the one-time “wonder drugs.”
Indeed, more than half of all Staphylococcus aureus infections in U.S. hospitals, where it is a persistent scourge – are resistant to formerly potent antibiotics such as penicillin, methicillin, tetracycline and erythromycin, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In such cases, only the strongest, newest antibiotics, such as vancomycin, work – and some bacterial strains are now resistant to it.
For a variety of reasons, most pharmaceutical research has tended to focus on tweaking existing drugs to keep them effective or relevant, said UCSD's Nizet, who is also on Burnham's scientific advisory board. But that's clearly not enough.
New chemicals with antibiotic properties must be found – new chinks in microbial armor revealed.
“This research is an example of the latter,” Nizet said. “It's one of a handful of approaches that all have to be pursued in combination because things aren't going to get better anytime soon. Bacteria is perfect proof of evolution in action, constantly adapting to selective life-and-death pressures. These pathogens are not going to go away.”
3 comments:
To think that bacteria and viruses can become immune to medicine frustrates me so much. Whenever my throat gets pus (yes, it's so gross!) or gets infected I always imagine viruses and bacteria being so happy at my depression of not being able to even swallow a pill without my throat killing me. I get a relief at reading this blog because it builds a hope to think that scientist are close to find a new antibiotic that will kill those horrible beings once and for all. Well at least to stop their immunity, which I know will make many people joyful. Mainly those who get ill many times during the year. Including myself.
Its not surprising but amazing how bacteria is perfect proof of evolution in action. I didn't know bacteria constantly adapted to selective life I thought it was all life. This research should continue to be funded for many years to come. Many more basis for a new class of antibacterial agents of capable of overcoming current multidrug resistance should be discovered. These new "golden targets" would be very helpful in the future. I believe other people will be grateful for having intelligent doctors and scientists. I mean they already discovered that bacterium dies without the bacterial enzyme NadD. INTERESTING! Bacterial enzymes are fascinating to learn about, I'm sure other future readers will think so as well.
It is amazing to know how bacteria can resists antibodies. Well it will not be for long since now they can become inmune or even killed. This is capable of happening thanks to the help of an NadD enzyme attaking the bacteria. This still needs to be tested but it is not harmful to humans since the NadD of humans is different to those of the bacteria.
Post a Comment